Idaho Public
Utilities Commission
Case
No. PAC-E-10-07
June
15, 2010
Contact:
Gene Fadness (208) 334-0339, 890-2712
Website:
www.puc.idaho.gov
Commission begins processing Rocky
Mountain rate case
The
Idaho Public Utilities Commission has suspended for up to six months an
application by PacifiCorp to increase customer rates by an average 13.7
percent.
The
suspension will allow time for the commission’s staff of auditors, engineers
and attorneys to thoroughly review the company’s application. PacifiCorp does
business as Rocky Mountain Power in southeastern Idaho, where it serves about
70,000 customers.
The
commission cannot, by state law, arbitrarily refuse to consider utility rate
increase requests. State statutes require that all rate requests be considered
by the commission to determine whether the expenses the utility seeks to
recover through customer rates were needed to serve customers and if they were
prudently incurred. The commission is free to accept, reject or modify the
company’s request. However, when the commission denies expense recovery it must
be able to legally demonstrate why the expenses were not needed or prudently
incurred. All commission decisions can be appealed to the state Supreme Court
by the utility, intervenors or customers.
The
commission has set an intervention deadline of June 30 for parties seeking “intervenor”
status in the case. Parties, typically representing large customers or groups
of customers, intervene in rate cases to present evidence, cross-examine
witnesses, participate in settlement conferences and make and argue motions. Parties
seeking intervenor status to date include Agrium, Inc. (Nu West), the Idaho
Irrigation Pumpers Association and Monsanto. As the case develops, members of
the general public, who do not have intervenor status, will have the opportunity
to submit written comments for the case record and participate in public
workshops and testify at hearings that
will be scheduled later.
Increased
investment
Rocky
Mountain Power states the increase is needed to cover expenses for more than $4
billion of new plant investment and $87 million in increased power supply
costs. Investments proposed in this case are already serving customers or will
be by the end of 2010. Those include eight new wind generation plants, a
345-kilovolt transmission line from Downey to Salt to Lake City, environmental
improvements at the Dave Johnston, Huntington and Jim Bridger power plants,
turbine upgrades at the Hunter, Huntington and Jim Bridge power plants and
hydro power relicensing and upgrade investments.
About
30 percent of the requested additional yearly revenue requirement of $27.7
million is due to increases in power supply costs which include expenses
related to fuel, purchases of power from the wholesale market and transmission
wheeling. The largest contributors to the proposed increase in power supply are
increasing coal costs and the replacement of older power supply contracts that
had lower prices with newer, higher-priced contracts.
According
to testimony filed by the company, lower load projections and current economic
conditions have resulted in Rocky Mountain scaling back some transmission and
distribution capital expenditures from previously planned levels. The company
has reduced its 10-year capital budget from nearly $2.2 billion per year to
$1.6 billion annually and plans no investments in new company-owned generation
until 2014.
Despite
those reductions, Rocky Mountain asserts it still must continue its multi-year
program of investing in renewable energy, transmission facilities and
environmental controls.
According
to testimony filed by company president Richard Walje, a significant amount of
new capital investment is coming from PacifiCorp’s parent company, MidAmerican
Energy Holdings Company. According to Walje, Rocky Mountain expects to receive
$100 million in additional cash equity contributions from MEHC before the end
of this year. MEHC has not taken any dividends from PacifiCorp since MEHC
acquired PacifiCorp in 2006 and is not expected to take any cash out of the
business, Walje said.
Rate structure
Responding
to a directive from the commission after the company’s last rate case, Rocky
Mountain is proposing a two-tiered rate structure for residential customers
under which customers pay more when their use exceeds 800 kWh per month.
Customers
who stay below the company’s average residential use of 839 kWh year-round will
pay only about 1 percent more per year under the company’s proposed rate.
However, larger users will see substantially large increases if the application
is approved.
The
proposed winter rate (November through April) for the first 800 kWh of use is
6.55 cents per kWh. For use above that, the proposed rate jumps to 8.84 cents.
The current winter rate for residential customers is about 8 cents per kWh.
The
proposed residential summer rate for the first 800 kWh is 8.95 cents per kWh.
Use above that is proposed to be about 12 cents. The current summer rate is
about 10.4 cents.
Proposed
increases for customer classes vary according to the cost the company incurs to
serve each customer class.
The
company’s proposed increase for residential customers, including all energy and
customer service charges, is about 8 percent.
For
residential customers who are on optional Time of Day Rates, the proposed
increase is 15.6 percent. However, the average rate for a time-of-day customer
would still be about 1.35 cents per kWh lower than standard residential rates,
according to the company’s application.
The
proposed increase for small general service customers is 10.8 percent, for
medium- and large- general service customers, 14.6 percent; for irrigation
customers, 9.6 percent; and for large industrial customers, from 15.9 percent
to 19.6 percent. The proposed increases for Rocky Mountain’s large contract
customers are 19.6 percent for Monsanto and 15.9 percent for Nu-West.
The
company’s last rate case was filed in September 2008 when Rocky Mountain
requested a 4 percent overall increase. That case was settled in April 2009
when the company was granted a 3.1 percent increase.
Customers
can track the progress of the case on the commission’s Web site where the
company’s application, as well as testimony from several company officials, is
posted. As the case progresses, testimony from commission staff and intervenors
will be added as will customer comments. The Web site is www.puc.idaho.gov. Click on the electric
icon, then on “Open Electric Cases,” and scroll down to Case No. PAC-E-10-07.
Copies of the application are also available at company offices in Rexburg, Preston, Shelley and Montpelier.